
Responsibility
Responsibility of Authors
- Authors must ensure their submitted work is completely original and free from plagiarism. Any reuse of others’ work must be properly cited to respect intellectual property rights.
- All data and research findings should be accurately reported, avoiding any fabrication or falsification to maintain trustworthiness.
- Authors are required to disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence the interpretation or presentation of their research.
- Ethical approvals must be obtained for studies involving human participants or animals, and authors should follow relevant ethical guidelines.
- Before submission, authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and take responsibility for its content.
- Authors should promptly respond to any editorial or reviewer requests and revise their manuscripts accordingly.
- Proper citation practices must be followed, and duplicate or redundant publications are strictly prohibited.
- All listed authors should have significantly contributed to the research and must agree to the manuscript submission.
- If errors are identified after publication, authors must promptly notify the journal to issue corrections or retractions as needed.
- Compliance with the journal’s submission guidelines and ethical policies is mandatory for all authors.
Responsibilities of Editors
- Editors must manage manuscript submissions impartially, ensuring decisions are based solely on academic merit and relevance.
- They oversee a confidential, double-blind peer-review process that guarantees fairness and prevents bias.
- Editors should maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and protect reviewer identities at all times.
- Any conflicts of interest must be disclosed and managed transparently to avoid compromising editorial decisions.
- Editors are responsible for promptly addressing ethical issues such as plagiarism or research misconduct.
- Clear and timely communication with authors, reviewers, and publishers is essential throughout the editorial process.
- Editors must ensure that all editorial policies and ethical standards are strictly followed.
- Providing guidance and support to reviewers helps maintain the quality and integrity of manuscript evaluations.
- Decisions on publication should be transparent and based on rigorous scholarly criteria.
- Editors should promote accountability and uphold the highest ethical standards in all editorial activities.
Responsibility of Reviewers
- Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback to help improve manuscript quality.
- Confidentiality regarding the manuscript content and the identities of authors and reviewers must be strictly maintained.
- Reviewers should declare any potential conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment to ensure impartiality.
- They must accept review requests only when they have the necessary expertise to provide an informed evaluation.
- Information gained through peer review should not be used for personal advantage or disclosed inappropriately.
- Reviews should be conducted fairly, without bias or discrimination of any kind.
- Reviewers must offer clear, detailed comments to support authors in improving their work.
- Any suspected ethical issues or misconduct discovered during review should be reported to the editors immediately.
- Intellectual property rights of authors must be respected throughout the review process.
- Reviewers should complete their assessments within the agreed timelines to support efficient publication.
Responsibility of Publisher
- The publisher must uphold the journal’s ethical standards and support editorial independence at all times.
- Ensuring data privacy and secure handling of all submission and review information is a key responsibility.
- Providing robust technical infrastructure and resources ensures a smooth manuscript submission and publication process.
- The publisher is responsible for preserving published content’s integrity and long-term accessibility for the scholarly community.
- Facilitating transparent and open communication among authors, editors, and reviewers helps maintain trust.
- Allegations of ethical misconduct should be thoroughly investigated in cooperation with editors and relevant authorities.
- The publisher promotes awareness and education about ethical publishing practices among all stakeholders.
- Compliance with applicable laws, including copyright and data protection regulations, is mandatory.
- Supporting continuous improvement efforts helps maintain and enhance the journal’s quality and reputation.
- Transparency regarding fees, policies, and publication procedures ensures fairness and trust for all participants.